Dog shot by police, her only crime was being old - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by triodegirl on 08 August 2012 - 16:08

Let's face it. Negative posts always get more attention, even when they are crap. (I agree with zdog.) Who wants to hear about a cop who was shot 9 times by a lunatic, but still waved off the officers who were coming to help him, telling them there were people in the temple who needed help? Sad.

Ninja181

by Ninja181 on 08 August 2012 - 16:08

"" Her only crime was being old""

BE, that is part of the title, and was tacked on by the journalist.

The police didn't say, "hey dog you're old you gotta die".

''''Dog shot by police''''

Yes the police shot the dog, after the neighbor reported it's deplorable condition, with the blessings of the owner.

BE, What EXACTLY did the police do wrong?

I want you to explain what law or policy they broke.




StrayPixels (admin)

by StrayPixels on 08 August 2012 - 16:08

You will NOT be bulling a poster! She can make ANY type of thread she wants, as long as it's within the TOS! You have every right, to defend or attack that story BUT you have no right attacking her!

THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM OUT THERE PEOPLE ~ Which will NOT be covered up here!

We don't cover up breeders or trainers or anyone else killing dogs and we will not cover up the police! YOU WILL NOT BULLY US INTO IT EITHER

Posters have said many times, it's the actions and those who committed them or covered them up, that upset them and that they want to talk about! NOT ALL OFFICERS! It's not hard to understand that!

This is a final warning... Quit calling members, LEO bashers and derailing these threads.

You keep bring up ggturners thread and how it wasn't intended to go the way it did.  That's the chance you take when you make a thread. And for those of you who keep saying, these LEO bashers took it off topic.... NO, it does have to do with the topic! Why do you need to protect your pets?  What's the proof?

Coming on this thread to attack farmers has no connection to the topic. Posting a link to a story about a farmer killing a tiger in a different country was way off topic!  You all went after farmers because BE is a farmer. Want to honestly talk about farmers and killing animals, take it to the OT!

Yesterday, anytime I was able to quickly pop on this site, I only saw 1 mod working. Trying to take care of this whole site. Today I have time and will go through this thread! Have something to say about what I have said? Follow the TOS and send a PM.

Gigante

by Gigante on 08 August 2012 - 18:08

I will NOT post anything more about police killing innocent pets on their own property or police and SWAT RAID killing innocent residents in their own home.



It cant be intelligently argued that there was or is a problem with pets being killed

As stated I think this articles crap and the story as well on face value. If I dont get someones post's I may say something and just move on, attacking you personally and not your argument = coward = weak 












Gigante

by Gigante on 08 August 2012 - 18:08



We all have agendas, also known as person opinion, she is entitled to hers, as you. 

Killing my or your pet in our homes, is more of a mountain then molehill, to some, even most. To me.

by beetree on 08 August 2012 - 19:08



And I disagree about your equating personal opinion as the same as an agenda. Nice try.

by zdog on 08 August 2012 - 19:08




The things we could garner from a 3rd hand account that used a facebook post as their source of reference and passd off as "facts" was that a dog was very old and dying, the owners figured the dog would be dead "soon".

a neighbor thought the dog was suffering enough and in bad enough shape to call and make a complaint and when the officer arrived, he recieved PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER to euthanize the old and dying dog.  The officer then dug a hole and helped them bury their dog.

When you strip away the emotion evoking words and the misleading headlines and look at what few facts are there, it hardly seems like something to get all worked up about.

It certainly doesn't paint the picture of a cop that just walks around in the middle of the night looking for dogs to shoot for being old, like they would like everyone to believe.

Sorry if a 3rd hand account based off a facebook story that doesn't even tell the story some are trying to push doesn't pass the sniff test for me.


Gigante

by Gigante on 08 August 2012 - 19:08

Why should anyone try to stop a poster from yapping on a free public forum unless it becomes abusive. Move on .com or attack the post. Personally I think I have hit the abuse button once twice ever in 5-6 years of reading. Im not a babysitter fan. Not that its not, a necessary evil in a public forum.

by beetree on 08 August 2012 - 19:08

What are you talking about? I never hit an abuse button here. Last time I hit the abuse button I hit it on myself! You are deflecting. No one is stopping yapping, just stopping hurtful lies, really, would be satisfying.

Gigante

by Gigante on 08 August 2012 - 19:08

 I keep forgetting to fill out the proper forms myself, when I go to protest some of the stretching of the relevancies  here, in an attempt to see if there are other like minded, reasoned thinkers floating about in the ether. 


Not an attack a personal statement. I have no Idea if you do or not. Did I miss read this statement? Sorry

And if you hit on youself thats damn funny!!!!!!!


Before agenda is opinion. Your opinion on someones agenda is yet your agenda on opinion. Dont mock me to hard there but I think that makes sense, I may have to put more brain cells around it as I just made that up.

just stopping hurtful lies

???





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top