![Premium classified](https://cdn.pedigreedatabase.com/images/placeholder-min.png)
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Nancy on 26 March 2009 - 18:03
The reason white is a differernt case is it is carried on a different chromosome than the other patterns and, if doubled up, masks the true color of the dog. The dog is still genetically whatever it is and can pass on that gene.
Molly in no way said if you have one sable parent any of its offspring will be sable. A sable dog could carry any other color and produce puppies with that color depending on the color gene they inherit from the other parent.
She said two B&T cannot produce sable. If a B&T has the sable gene, it will be a sable.
Unlike you I am not even breeding dogs and could care less if a good dog was pink with yellow polka dots, but this is pretty well known stuff.
![gagsd4](/usericon/12144.jpg)
by gagsd4 on 26 March 2009 - 18:03
Sable is a dominant color gene. If a dog carries sable, they are sable. (unless they have the white masking gene). A dog carrying a sable gene WILL NOT be blk/tan, bicolor or black.
There is no way 2 black/tan(red) parents threw a sable puppy.
--Mary
by ecs on 26 March 2009 - 18:03
![Mystee](/usericon/55570.jpg)
by Mystee on 26 March 2009 - 18:03
by eichenluft on 26 March 2009 - 18:03
I have a bicolor female who does not carry black - bred to black she produces bicolors and black/tans. Meaning she is a bicolor/black tan, or blacktan with bicolor "tag" - anyway. I have a grey sable female who also does not carry black - she produces dark black/tans and bicolors in her litters when bred to a black stud (and dark sables). So that would mean that bicolor is not in fact a separate color gene, but instead a "gene tag" attached to the black/tan of some dogs.
One indication I have learned over the years - is if a sable dog carries black OR bicolor, he/she will have black toe marks/tarheels. If they carry black/tan or another sable gene, there will be no black toe marks/tarheels present.
molly
![Mystee](/usericon/55570.jpg)
by Mystee on 26 March 2009 - 19:03
![Ryanhaus](/usericon/35782.jpg)
by Ryanhaus on 26 March 2009 - 19:03
DNA is the bottom line
![](https://www.pedigreedatabase.com/fckeditor/editor/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif)
People can say whatever they want, I can bet you neither parent has any DNA on file to reference.
![yellowrose of Texas](/usericon/21384.jpg)
by yellowrose of Texas on 26 March 2009 - 19:03
One big problem may be that you just think the parents are both BLK/red . One of them is a patterned sable..not a black /red..
Many pups turn out to be patterned sables not Blk/red. Until a dog is two it is anyone's guess..Probably do a serious dna research on the parents and grand parents of what you are asking about and you may find out ..dog you think is sable isnt sable or parents were not both blk/red/
by grgtwnbaxley on 26 March 2009 - 20:03
![yellowrose of Texas](/usericon/21384.jpg)
by yellowrose of Texas on 26 March 2009 - 20:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top